Accessibility
How this site is built to be usable, what we have checked, and what we have not.
We want anyone to be able to read this site and get in touch, whatever they are using to do it. Below is what that has meant in practice, stated specifically enough that you can hold us to it.
What we have done
A typeface chosen for legibility, not for style
The whole site is set in Atkinson Hyperlegible, drawn by the Braille Institute so that easily-confused characters stay distinct: b and d, p and q, capital I against lowercase l against the numeral 1, capital O against zero. One of this firm's owners is dyslexic, so this is a first-class reader of the site rather than a hypothetical one.
Spacing and line length set for reading, site-wide
Body text runs at a 1.6 line height, stays left-aligned rather than justified, and breaks to avoid stranding a single word on its own line. These are set once in the stylesheet rather than page by page, so they cannot quietly regress on a new page. The research on dyslexia is consistent that balanced spacing, size, and line height do more for legibility than any particular typeface does, which is why this layer is treated as more important than the font choice above it.
Keyboard operation, with focus you can see
A skip-to-content link is the first thing the keyboard reaches on every page, so you can jump past the navigation. Every focusable element draws a visible two-pixel outline with a two-pixel offset when reached by keyboard, and that outline is never suppressed.
Motion is optional and fully off when you ask
If your operating system is set to reduce motion, this site honors it: scroll reveals, the animated background on the home page, button glows, page-transition fades, hover lifts, navigation underlines, and the theme crossfade all stop, and the smooth-scrolling layer never starts at all. Nothing is left running at a lower intensity.
Contrast is measured, in text and in diagrams, and the measurements have caught real problems
The palette is measured rather than assumed, and the measurements have found genuine defects. Muted body text was darkened after measuring 4.39:1 against the gray background, just under the 4.5:1 threshold for normal text. The green on text-bearing buttons was darkened separately so white lettering clears that threshold on the fill. The statistics on the About page were recolored in dark mode after measuring 1.9:1, which is unreadable. The text color used on top of the navy brand fill is now a declared value that gets checked, instead of white assumed to work. Drawn marks are held to their own lower threshold of 3:1, which is what the guidelines ask of a graphic you need in order to follow the content: every accent stroke and fill in the four diagram panels was measured in a real browser at 2.9947:1 against the panel behind it and moved to a dedicated ink measuring 4.5575:1, and the supporting grey marks beside them, measured at 1.1250:1, were moved to one measuring 4.3242:1. Both themes were measured, and the numbers are published in the audit rather than summarized.
It works with JavaScript blocked or broken
The words are all there without JavaScript: text, headings, lists, and links are in the page as served. The reveal animations and the animated logo degrade to their finished, visible state rather than staying hidden, so a slow connection or a failed script never leaves you reading a blank page. The three canvas diagrams are the exception: a canvas cannot draw itself without script, so the composition on the home page, the compass field on the About page, and the ranked chart on the recruiting page render as empty boxes. The About and recruiting diagrams sit inside prose that makes the same argument in words; the home page diagram has no written equivalent yet, and that one is a real gap.
Light, dark, or whatever your system prefers
The theme follows your operating system by default and can be set explicitly to light or dark. Both themes are held to the same contrast checks; neither is an afterthought.
Structure a screen reader can navigate
Pages use real landmarks: one main region per page, labeled navigation regions, headings in order, and lists marked up as lists. Decorative graphics are hidden from assistive technology rather than announced as meaningless images.
What we have not done
An accessibility statement that lists only strengths is marketing. These are the real limits of the work above.
- No independent accessibility audit has been performed on this site. Everything above is our own work, checked by us.
- We have not tested every page against every combination of screen reader, browser, and operating system.
- This site is actively under development, and some pages are still drafts. New work can introduce new barriers.
- We do not claim conformance with any particular level of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). We have done the work described above; we have not done the formal evaluation that a conformance claim requires.
If something here does not work for you
Tell us. A specific report is more useful than a general one: the page, what you were trying to do, and what you were using to do it (a screen reader, keyboard only, a magnifier, voice control) is enough for us to reproduce it. We will tell you what we find and what we intend to do about it, including when the honest answer is that a fix will take a while.
If a barrier on this site is stopping you from reaching us, that is our problem to solve, never a workaround we hand you. Use whichever route below is easiest for you.
Contact form, or by mail:
Kosek Advisory Group LLC#3118, 111 North Wabash Ave. Ste. 100The Garland BuildingChicago, IL 60602This statement was last reviewed on 24 August 2026. It describes the site as built on that date and is revised when the site changes, not on a schedule. The previous review was 5 August 2026; the diagram panels added on 7 and 22 August, and the contrast fixes they prompted, are what this revision covers.